Experts raise concerns over Nigerian court’s $25,000 ruling against Meta
Experts share their concerns over a Nigerian High Court ruling in Femi Falana's court case against Meta.
<br />
On January 13, 2026, a Lagos State High Court delivered a significant judgement in favour of human rights lawyer Femi Falana, SAN, against Meta Platforms Inc, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, in a case centred on privacy invasion and misinformation.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The ruling, publicly shared by the plaintiff’s lawyer and privacy expert Olumide Babalola on LinkedIn, showed the judgement in favour of the user granting the plaintiff $25,000 as compensation.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
However, some experts have raised concerns over the impact of this judgement and the precedence it sets.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The case in brief <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
In early 2025, a video circulated on Facebook that reportedly falsely portrayed Falana as suffering from a serious medical condition. Though the content’s originator remains unnamed in the ruling summary, the High Court held Meta responsible, dismissing the company’s claims that it was merely a neutral hosting service for third-party content.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
According to the court, Meta owed a duty of care to users whose personal data and reputation were affected by content on its platforms, and as such, it breached Section 24 of the National Data Protection Act of 2023. Per Babalola, the court stated that Meta could not hide behind the intermediary and hosting defence once it monetises content and controls distribution systems.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
As stated, false medical information about an individual, even a public figure, constitutes invasion of privacy under Nigerian law. And as a joint data controller, not just as a passive conduit of content, the platform determines the means and purposes of processing user content and employs algorithmic distribution for commercial benefit.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
This legal framing, however, that a big tech company is not merely a platform but an active participant in content distribution is unprecedented in the Nigerian context and sets an important judicial precedent.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Expert concerns over this precedence <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Following the court’s ruling, some experts have raised concerns about its effects on the aver...
